Evidence Hub

Fracture risk tools performance and potential use in systemic lupus erythematosus

Aldegheri F, Rotta D, Galvagni I, Pistillo F, Fassio A, Gatti D, Zen M, Ravagnani V et al.

Lupus science & medicine, 2026

106 participants

Abstract

Objective: Skeletal fragility is a major comorbidity in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), yet the accuracy of fracture risk algorithms in this population remains uncertain. We compared the discriminative ability of Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) and the Italian FRAX-derived tool (DeFRA) for fractures in SLE.

Methods: This is a secondary analysis of the multicentre osteoporosis and FRagility fracture Among SLE patients (FRAIL - NCT05590390) cohort that included patients with SLE who underwent dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry with vertebral fracture assessment (VFA). Vertebral fractures were confirmed by radiography. For each patient, 10-year major osteoporotic fracture probability was calculated using FRAX and DeFRA. Discrimination was assessed with receiver operating characteristic curves and DeLong's test. Operational thresholds (FRAX ≥20%, DeFRA ≥20% and 15%) were evaluated for sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and number needed to scan (NNS=1/positive predictive value). Robustness of estimates was tested using 2000 bootstrap resamples with out-of-bag evaluation.

Results: 106 patients with SLE were included in the study. Mean age was 53.6 years, 88.7% were female and 41.5% were on glucocorticoids. Morphometric vertebral fractures were identified in 23 patients (21.7%), including 15 previously unrecognised. For newly detected fractures, area under the curve (AUC) was higher for DeFRA (0.834, 95% CI 0.725 to 0.944) than FRAX (0.681, 95% CI 0.495 to 0.867;…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 106 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free