Evidence Hub

Osteoporosis treatment gap and prescribing patterns in Ireland: a cross-sectional analysis of the DXA HIP project

Carey JJ, Brennan A, Armstrong C, Heaney F, Dempsey A, Egan R, Gorham K, Yang L et al.

BMJ open, 2026

5,564 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Objectives: Previous studies suggest Ireland has the smallest osteoporosis treatment in Europe and very little inappropriate prescribing, in contrast to our experience. In this study, we examine the osteoporosis treatment gap in Ireland by assessing the prevalence of appropriate and inappropriate prescribing in 2 subgroups of the Irish dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) Health Informatics Prediction (HIP) Project. Treatment eligibility was defined using established intervention thresholds, including prior fracture, femoral-neck T-score ≤-2.5, glucocorticoid use, or Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) major osteoporotic fracture risk ≥20% or hip fracture risk ≥3%.

Design: Secondary cross-sectional analysis of a subgroup of the DXA HIP Project Cohort.

Setting: 3 hospitals in the West of Ireland. DXA referrals come from primary care providers, hospital consultants and the osteoporosis service.

Participants: 5564 participants of a previously described convenience cohort including: (i) 3474 subjects referred for a DXA scan, and (ii) 2090 patients who completed a DXA scan.

Results: 82.4% were female with a mean age of 66.6 years, 59.6% of whom had a prior fracture. Prescribing data of calcium and vitamin D were available for 3738 (67.2%) subjects, and osteoporosis medication for 4157 (74.7%) subjects. Prescribing information was available for more than 99% of the DXA group, but just over 50% of the referral group. When examined in aggregate, the treatment gap is 6% for…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 5,564 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free