Evidence Hub

The interplay of GLP-1 receptor agonist use, chronic kidney disease and fracture risk in obese pAtients: a retrospective cohort study

Eubanks A, Allen KC, Kearney DQ, Bell B, Albornoz A, Elkomi R, Ross D, Beyene E et al.

British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2026

13 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Aims: To evaluate the association between Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) use and fracture risk in patients with or without chronic kidney disease (CKD).

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using TriNetX, including patients aged 18-50. Two primary cohorts were defined: obese patients with CKD on GLP-1RAs ≥ 1 year (CKD+/GLP-1RA+) and obese patients with CKD not on GLP-1RAs (CKD+/GLP-1RA-). A subgroup analysis compared CKD+/GLP-1RA + patients to obese patients without CKD on GLP-1RAs (CKD-/GLP-1RA+). Primary outcomes were upper and lower limb fractures. Risk analysis and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis assessed fracture incidence over 5 years.

Results: After matching, 13 441 patients were included per cohort. CKD+/GLP-1RA + patients had fewer fractures than CKD+/GLP-1RA- patients (Risk Difference: -0.016, 95% CI: -0.018, -0.013; RR: 0.196, 95% CI: 0.145, 0.265; OR: 0.193, 95% CI: 0.143, 0.261), with higher fracture-free survival (99.31% vs. 95.47%; p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis (13 723 patients per cohort) showed CKD+/GLP-1RA + patients had a slightly higher fracture risk than CKD-/GLP-1RA + patients (Risk Difference: 0.003, 95% Cl: 0.001, 0.004; RR: 2.357, 95% Cl: 1.516, 3.665; OR: 2.364, 95% Cl: 1.518, 3.680), with lower fracture-free survival (98.87% vs. 99.19%; p < 0.001).

Conclusion: These findings suggest a possible CKD-associated modification on the skeletal effects of GLP-1RAs, implicating that CKD patients' bone health should be…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 13 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free