Evidence Hub

Low vitamin D status and 10-year dementia risk in sensory-impaired adults: a propensity score-matched cohort study

Hung KC, Weng HL, Lai YC, Chen IW

Frontiers in nutrition, 2026

158,382 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

Background Sensory impairment is a strong modifiable risk factor for dementia; however, whether vitamin D deficiency (VDD) was associated with increased risk in this high-risk group remains unclear. Individuals with vision or hearing impairment are prone to VDD due to reduced sunlight exposure, making this question clinically relevant. Methods From the TriNetX Global Collaborative Network, this retrospective cohort study identified adults aged ≥50 years with documented vision and/or hearing impairment and serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] measurement. Patients were classified into VDD group (<20 ng/mL) and control group (≥30 ng/mL). The index date was defined as the date of the first 25(OH)D measurement that met the cohort-specific threshold and satisfied all eligibility criteria. The primary outcome was incident dementia over a 10-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes included dementia subtypes (i.e., vascular dementia and Alzheimer’s disease), cognitive impairment, osteoporotic fracture (positive control), healthcare visits (detection bias assessment), and recurrent VDD. Results After propensity score matching, 158,382 patients were included in each cohort. Compared to the control group, the VDD group was associated with a significantly higher risk of incident dementia [hazard ratio (HR), 1.55; p < 0.001], vascular dementia (HR, 1.70; p < 0.001), Alzheimer’s disease (HR, 1.48; p < 0.001), cognitive impairment (HR, 1.40; p < 0.001), and subsequent VDD (HR, 4.73; p < 0.001).…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 158,382 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free