Evidence Hub

A call for action: standard of care guidelines to assess vitamin D status are needed for patients with hip fracture

M. F. Holick

American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2020

1 citation

Abstract

In this issue of the Journal, Hao et al. (1) report a secondary analysis of a multicenter study on a large cohort of patients who had a hip fracture requiring surgical intervention to determine the influence of vitamin D status and the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index on mortality rates and ability to ambulate. They conclude that patients who had a serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] of ≥ 12 ng/mL had higher rates of self-reported walking at 30 and 60 d postoperatively compared with patients with a 25(OH)D < 12 ng/mL. On the other hand, poor nutritional status was observed to have a marginal effect on reduced mobility at 30 d but not at 60 d. They also found no association of vitamin D status nor nutritional status on mortality at these 2 time points. This editorial begins with a brief summary of previous studies providing insight about the controversy associated with vitamin D supplementation recommendations for improving muscle function. It then discusses the merits of the study by Hao et al. (1) and its health implications not only for elderly with hip fractures but also for all children and adults.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free