Evidence Hub

Comparative efficacy, safety and compliance with dual, triple and quadruple therapy as the first-line treatment regimens for Helicobacter pylori eradication: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Taufiqqurrachman I, Syam AF, Maulahela H, Abdullah M, Matsumoto T, Miftahussurur M, Yamaoka Y

BMJ open gastroenterology, 2026

5 citations

Abstract

Objective: To assess the efficacy, safety and compliance with dual, triple and quadruple therapy first-line regimens for Helicobacter pylori eradication.

Design: A systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) reported in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses NMA guidance.

Data sources: PubMed, Cochrane Library, ProQuest and Scopus were searched until 12 October 2025.

Eligibility criteria: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in English that measured the eradication rate, adverse events and compliance rates of dual therapy compared with triple or quadruple therapy for H. pylori first-line treatment.

Data extraction and synthesis: Data extraction and risk-of-bias assessment were performed by two independent reviewers. The data were analysed and represented as pooled ORs. Heterogeneity was assessed using meta-regression and trim-and-fill analyses.

Results: Pairwise meta-analysis of 56 RCTs showed that dual therapy had no different eradication rates than triple therapy (intention-to-treat (ITT): OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.29; per-protocol (PP): OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.25). Dual therapy outperformed quadruple therapy (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.39) with fewer adverse events (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.38) and higher compliance rates (OR: 1.49, 95% CI 1.26 to 1.76). Based on the NMA, RAC-7 has the highest probability of effective treatment for both ITT (P-score=0.9436) and PP (P-score=0.9545).

Conclusion: Dual therapy…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free