Evidence Hub

Evaluation of factors related to the occurrence of new fragility fractures: A case-control study

Oteo-Álvaro Á, Marín Becerra MT, Fernández-Fernández T, Arrieta-Bartolomé G

Revista espanola de cirugia ortopedica y traumatologia, 2023

629 participants

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Fragility fractures (FF) are frequent in osteoporotic patients. There are a series of risk factors and clinical variables that could predict their appearance.

MATERIAL AND METHOD: A retrospective observational study of cases and controls was carried out. Cases were defined by the presence of FF (326 participants) and controls by patients with similar characteristics without FF (629 participants).

RESULTS: Certain factors increase the risk of FF, such as a previous diagnosis of type 2 DM (OR: 2.001), 1ng/mL elevations of CTX (OR: 1.88), having a parental history of hip fracture (OR: 1.667), 5-year increase in age (OR: 1.39), and 1kg/m2 increases in BMI (OR: 1.041). In contrast, other factors evaluated decreased this risk, such as maintaining 25(OH)D levels≥30ng/mL (OR: 0.686) and a T-score≥-2.5 (OR: 0.642).

CONCLUSIONS: Levels of 25(OH)D≥30ng/mL and a T-score at the femoral neck≥-2.5 are protective factors for FF, while a previous diagnosis of type 2 DM, an elevated CTX, a parental history of hip fracture, an increase of 1kg/m2 in BMI and an increase in age by 5 years would be predisposing to FF.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case-control, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 629 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free