Evidence Hub

Degree of Joint Risk Factor Control and Incident Fracture Outcomes in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes

Huang H, Cai J, Hu H, Cai L, Qi L, Zhou T

The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 2025

8,935 participants

Abstract

CONTEXT: Individuals with type 2 diabetes have a higher fracture risk than the general population. However, the association between joint risk factor control and fracture risk in this population remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the extent to which joint risk factor control might attenuate the excess risk of fracture outcomes in individuals with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS: We included 8935 individuals with type 2 diabetes and 35 740 matched controls without fractures at baseline from the UK Biobank (UKB), with a median follow-up of 12.1 years. Six modifiable risk factors were assessed: body mass index (BMI), physical activity, smoking, alcohol consumption, serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D), and glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate associations between risk factor control and fracture risk.

RESULTS: Controlling each additional risk factor resulted in a 14% to 26% decrease in fracture risk. Optimal control (≥5 risk factors) correlated with a 50% reduction in overall fractures (HR 0.50; 95% CI 0.33-0.75). However, a 60% reduction in hip fractures (HR 0.40; 95% CI 0.16-0.98) was observed with the control of 4 risk factors. With control of 4 or more risk factors, fracture risk in individuals with type 2 diabetes was comparable to that of nondiabetic controls, and the protective effect was stronger in men than in women.

CONCLUSION: Joint risk factor control was significantly linked to a reduced fracture risk, and optimal…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case-control, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 8,935 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free