Evidence Hub

Prevalence of atypical femoral fractures, a clinical update: A comparative retrospective study 7 years later

Bottai V, Antognetti D, Troiano E, Mazzantini M, Ipponi E, Capanna R, Mondanelli N, Giannotti S

Injury, 2024

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Atypical femoral fractures (AFFs) are a rare type of subtrochanteric or diaphyseal fracture frequently associated with the use of bisphosphonates (BPs). They are a clinical entity often overlooked, for which a correct clinical-instrumental classification is essential for a successful treatment. Nowadays, there is no accurate data on their real incidence. The aim of this work is to evaluate the period prevalence of AFFs and their risk factors, and to compare actual results with a previous study conducted at the same Institution seven years previously.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The same methodology used in the previous study, conducted by the same Authors, was applied. Radiographs of all subtrochanteric and diaphyseal femoral fractures in patients over 60 years treated at a single Institution between January 2018 and February 2020 were reviewed, and cases that displayed the AFFs definition criteria were identified. Current and previous medical and pharmacological history were collected, and osteometabolic evaluation through the execution of first level blood tests, with the addition of a valuation of 25(OH)-vitamin D and parathormone was performed.

RESULTS: Out of 40 subtrochanteric or diaphyseal femoral fractures in patient aged 60 years or older, four cases (10 %) presented a characteristic radiographic pattern significative for AFFs, in comparison with a 5 % observed in the previous study. All four patients were women with a positive (current or previous) history…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free