Evidence Hub

The vitamin- D quantity versus bone quality: A logistic based regression modeling in Jordanian cohort who at higher risk of osteoporotic fracture

Hayat Yaser Abdalraheem Hilan, Haneen Anwar Salameh Al-Tarawneh, Manar Nader Ibraheem Jweinat, Safa Hassan Ahmad al Qiam, Aishah Awwad Flaih Alkhalailah, Samer Mahmoud Mohammad Ali Alboun

World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health Sciences, 2023

Abstract

Background: Several studies validated the positive impacts of Cholecalciferol derivatives; including dietary and non-dietary sources, on the bone architectural contents and the overall skeleton densities. We primarily aimed in this study to explore the optimal thresholds for the studied patients’ 25-OH Cholecalciferol levels that are correlated with the higher probabilities for having lumbar bone mineral density (LBMD) exceeding 0.835 g per cm2 and femoral hip bone mineral density (fH_BMD) exceeding 0.755 g per cm2. Methods: An observational retrospective study was conducted for patients, who are at risk of osteoporotic fracture, Firstly, a Binary Logistic Regression analysis was separately conducted for the investigated patients’ vitamin D levels against the patients’ fH_BMD ≥0.755 (Positive state) vs <0.755 (Negative state) and against the patients’ LBMD≥ 0.835 (Positive state) vs <0.835 (Negative state). Both the Receiver Operating Characteristic and the Sensitivity analyses were thereafter be conducted and the performances indices were explored. Results: Our constructed BLgR models, that logistically integrated the binary correlation between the investigated patients’ Vit D levels and their femoral hip or lumbar bone mineral densities, respectively, were constructed as [= e (--1.455+0.109× Vit D) /1+ e (--1.455+0.109× Vit D)] or [= e (--22.127+0.829× Vit D) /1+ e (--22.127+0.829× Vit D)], respectively. Conclusion: The optimal Vitamin D levels for our investigated…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free