Evidence Hub

Prenatal exposure to vitamin D from fortified margarine and risk of fractures in late childhood. Period and cohort results from 222 000 subjects in the D-tect observational study

M. N. Händel, P. Frederiksen, Clive Osmond, Cyrus Cooper, B. Abrahamsen, B. L. Heitmann

British Journal of Nutrition, 2017

18 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Prenatal low vitamin D may have consequences for bone health. By means of a nationwide mandatory vitamin D fortification program, we examined the risk of fractures among 10-18 year old children from proximate birth cohorts born around the date of the termination of the program. For all subjects born in Denmark during 1983-1988, civil registration numbers were linked to the Danish National Patient Registry for incident and recurrent fractures occurring at ages 10-18 years. Multiplicative Poisson models were used to examine the association between birth cohort and fracture rates. The variation in fracture rates across birth cohorts was analyzed by fitting an age-cohort model to the data. We addressed the potential modification of the effect of vitamin D availability by season of birth. The risk of fractures was increased among both girls and boys who were born before the vitamin D fortification terminated in 1985 (rate ratio (RR) exposed vs. non-exposed girls: 1.15 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.11, 1.20; RR exposed vs. non-exposed boys: 1.11 (95% CI: 1.07, 1.14). However, these associations no longer persisted after including the period effects. There was no interaction between season of birth and vitamin D availability in relation to fracture risk.The study did not provide evidence that prenatal exposure to extra vitamin D from a mandatory fortification program of 1.25 µg vitamin D/100 g margarine was sufficient to influence the risk of fractures in late childhood,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 18 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free