Evidence Hub

Comparing therapeutic and adverse effects of moxifloxacin and levofloxacin in treatment of community acquired pneumonia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Ben-Quan Wu, Yaman C. Pradhan, Tian-Tuo Zhang, Jing Huang, Jia-Xin Zhu

2012

1,310 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare more conclusively the efficacy and safety of moxifloxacin, a new respiratory fluoroquinolone antibiotic with levofloxacin therapy which has been reported to possess good efficacy for community acquired pneumonia (CAP) in hospitalized elderly patient. The entire patients were mild to moderate by CAP. All the trials administered intravenously moxifloxacin (400 mg daily) and intravenously levofloxacin (200500 mg daily) for 7-14 days. Clinical response during therapy was between days 3 and 5 after the start of therapy. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs, identified in CNKI, PubMeD, Embase, Google) were performed. Eight RCTs involving 1310 patients were included in metaanalysis. Two reviewers independently extracted data from published trials that compared fluoroquinolones. A meta-analysis was performed with the clinical outcomes of moxifloxacin and levofloxacin. Moxifloxacin monotherapy was associated with better therapeutic effect [(OR=1.63, 95%CI 1.01-2.63) and similar adverse effect (OR=1.12, 95%CI 0.81-1.55)] compared with levofloxacin therapy for CAP. Moxifloxacin has better therapeutic effects with comparable adverse events compared to levofloxacin.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,310 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free