Evidence Hub

Metabolic bone disease and fracture risk after gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: comparative analysis of a multi-institutional research network

Y. Hadi, Rupinder Mann, A. H. Sohail, S. Shah-Khan, N. Szoka, S. Abunnaja, L. Tabone, Shyam Thakkar et al.

Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, 2021

15 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) are the two most performed bariatric procedures. Multiple studies have investigated the metabolic bone complications after bariatric surgery, but there is a paucity of data comparing bone health after RYGB and SG.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the rates of major fractures and osteoporosis after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy.

SETTING

Data from TriNetX multi-institutional research network that includes data from multiple health care organizations in the USA was analyzed at West Virginia University.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using TriNetX, a federated multi-institutional research network. We identified patients who underwent RYGB or SG. Primary outcome was the rate of major fractures at 3 years after the procedure. Other outcomes included the rate of spine fracture, femur fracture, osteoporosis, and vitamin D deficiency at follow-up.

RESULTS

In unmatched analysis, patients with SG were less likely to have major fractures or an osteoporosis diagnosis than RYGB patients at 3 years after the procedure (P < .05). After propensity-score matching, similar results were noted; patients with SG were less likely to have major fractures than RYGB patients at 3 years after procedure (2.85% versus 3.66%, risk ratio [RR]: .78, 95% confidence interval [CI]: .71-.85), and a lower rate of osteoporosis diagnosis was noted in the SG group. High rates of vitamin D deficiency were noted in both…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free