Evidence Hub

Predictors of clinically meaningful bone mineral density gains with romosozumab: An explainable machine leaning analysis of a real-world cohort

D. C. Corredor, Luis Angel Calvo Pascual

Bone Reports, 2025

3 citations

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the real-world effectiveness of Romosozumab in postmenopausal women with severe osteoporosis and to identify baseline clinical and biochemical predictors of clinically meaningful bone mineral density (BMD) gains (≥10 %, used for exploratory classification) using an explainable machine-learning approach. Methods We conducted a retrospective, observational multicentre study across seven hospitals in Castilla-La Mancha, Spain. Postmenopausal women aged ≥50 years who initiated romosozumab between May 2023 and November 2024 for severe osteoporosis or high fracture risk were included. Lumbar-spine, femoral-neck, and total-hip BMD were assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at baseline and 12 months. Baseline biochemical variables included serum P1NP, CTX, PTH, vitamin D, calcium, phosphate, alkaline phosphatase, and creatinine. Predictors of a ≥ 10 % BMD gain were examined using elastic-net logistic regression combined with SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) for model interpretability. Results Fifty-eight women were analysed (mean ± SD age 71.7 ± 10.0 years; BMI 26.1 ± 4.8 kg/m2; mean age at menopause 47.3 ± 6.0 years). Mean 12-month BMD increases were + 15,35 % at the lumbar spine, +12,42 % at the femoral neck, and + 8,62 % at the total hip. The proportion achieving a ≥ 10 % gain was 39 %, 38.1 %, and 31.7 %, respectively. SHAP analysis identified consistent predictors of response: lower baseline BMD, higher phosphate levels, and younger age at…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free