Evidence Hub

The relationship of 25-hydroxyvitamin D values and risk of fracture: a population-based retrospective cohort study

Aul AJ, Dudenkov DV, Mara KC, Juhn YJ, Wi CI, Maxson JA, Thacher TD

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2020

11,002 participants

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Our study investigates 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and fracture risk using population-level data. 25-Hydroxyvitamin D values 50 ng/mL were not associated with increased risk of fractures overall compared with values 20-50 ng/mL. Severely low levels may be associated with increased risk of osteoporotic fracture, particularly of the wrist.

INTRODUCTION: Studies of the relationship between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels and fracture risk have been inconsistent. We hypothesized that high 25(OH)D concentrations (> 50 ng/mL) would be associated with increased risk of fracture.

METHODS: We identified all adult patients living in Olmsted County, Minnesota, between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2011, who had at least one 25(OH)D measurement. Fracture outcomes were retrieved starting 30 days after 25(OH)D measurement and until patients' final clinical visit as an Olmsted County resident, December 31, 2014, or death. Data were analyzed using Cox proportional hazard regression.

RESULTS: Of 11,002 individuals with a 25(OH)D measurement, 5.8% had a 25(OH)D value ˂ 12 ng/mL, and 5.1% had a value > 50 ng/mL. Compared with subjects with 25(OH)D values 20-50 ng/mL (reference group), values 50 ng/mL displayed no association with overall fracture risk. After adjusting for a prior diagnosis of osteoporosis/osteopenia, only individuals with values ˂ 12 ng/mL had increased risk of any osteoporotic fracture (aHR = 1.41; 95% CI 1.05-1.89) and wrist fracture (aHR = 2.11; 95%…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 11,002 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free