Evidence Hub

Prevalence and risk factors for secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) in patients undergoing bariatric surgery

Fischer LE, Moreno-Garcia F, Tran R, Harmon A, Little C, Domingue G, Stewart K, Mier Giraud F et al.

Surgical endoscopy, 2023

350 participants

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) after bariatric surgery has significant adverse implications for bone metabolism, increasing the risk for osteoporosis and fracture. Our aim was to characterize prevalence and identify risk factors for SHPT in bariatric surgery patients.

METHODS: We performed a single-institution, retrospective chart review of patients who underwent bariatric surgery from June 2017 through December 2021. Demographic and clinical data were collected, including serum parathyroid hormone, calcium, and vitamin D3 at enrollment and 3, 6, and 12-months postoperatively. Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests were used to analyze categorical data and Mann-Whitney U test for continuous data. Multivariable analysis using binomial logistic regression assessed risk factors for SHPT. P-values ≤ 0.05 were considered significant.

RESULTS: 350 patients were analyzed. SHPT prevalence at any time point was 72.9%. 65.8% had SHPT at enrollment; 45.9% resolved with intensive vitamin supplementation; and 19.7% had recurrent SHPT. New-onset SHPT occurred in 8.6%. Persistent SHPT was present in 42.4% at 1-year. Baseline SHPT correlated with black race and T2DM. SHPT at any time point correlated with T2DM and higher baseline BMI. 1-year SHPT correlated with RYGB, depression, and longer time in program. SHPT was not correlated with %TBWL at any time point. In patients with SHPT, vitamin D3 deficiency prevalence was significantly higher at baseline (77.0%) compared to all…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 350 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free