Evidence Hub

Can antibiotics prevent acute COPD exacerbation? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Haris Riaz, T. Abir, M. Rahman, A. Rehman, A. A. Kapadia, Talha Riaz

European Respiratory Journal, 2013

Abstract

Objective: To determine if antibiotics are efficacious in stable COPD. Methods: Pubmed, embase and cochrane database of controlled trials were searched from inception to december 2012. Quality assessment was done as per cochrane collaborations tool. The extracted data were then computed using STATA software. We converted the estimates to the common metric of a relative risk, since all studies compared two groups and reported binary outcomes. RRs were pooled and we calculated average RRs across measures within each study and used the average estimate in cross-study meta-analysis. Results Of 3912 articles searched, 8 RCTs met the inclusion criteria. The overall estimate revealed that antibiotics (azithromycin, clarithromycin, levofloxacin) have a significant role in preventing acute exacerbation (Relative Risk = 0.702, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.632 – 0.781, P The test for heterogeneity was Q= 4.143 on 7 degrees of freedom (p= 0.763). Conclusion: There is statistical evidence of the superiority of antibiotics in reducing the frequency of acute exacerbation in stable COPD warranting identification of patient groups most likely to benefit.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free