Evidence Hub

Association of bisphosphonate therapy with incident lower extremity fractures in persons with spinal cord injuries/disorders

L. Carbone, B. Gonzalez, S. Miskevics, C. Ray, Bella Etingen, M. Guihan, B. C. Craven, Varghese George et al.

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2020

7,989 participants · 10 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association between prescriptions for bisphosphonates, calcium/Vitamin D supplements, and receipt of DXA screening, and incident fracture risk in men and women with a spinal cord injury/disorder (SCI/D).

DESIGN

Propensity matched case control analyses.

SETTING

U.S. Veterans Affairs facilities.

PARTICIPANTS

7,989 men and 849 women with a SCI/D included in VA administrative databases between October 1, 2005 and October 1, 2015 were identified. Cases included 267 men and 59 women with a bisphosphonate prescription propensity matched with up to four controls.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Incident lower extremity fractures.

RESULTS

There was no significant association between prescriptions for bisphosphonates and incident lower extremity fractures in men (OR 1.04, 95% CI: 0.62-1.77) or women (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.28-3.75). In men, similar null associations were seen among those who were adherent to bisphosphonate therapy (OR 1.25, 95% CI: 0.73-2.16), were concomitant users of Vitamin D/calcium and a bisphosphonate (OR 1.05 95% CI: 0.57-1.96), had more than one fracture on different dates during the study period (OR 0.13, 95% CI: 0.02-1.16) and in those who had undergone dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) testing prior to the date of the bisphosphonate prescription and incident fracture (OR 1.26, 95% CI: 0.69-2.32).

CONCLUSIONS

In men with a traumatic SCI and women with a traumatic SCI or disorder, bisphosphonate therapies for…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 7,989 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free