Evidence Hub

Assessment of fracture risk in patients with spondyloarthritis using the FRAX scores

Henchiri I, Hamdi W, Maatallah K, Ferjani H, Kasraoui A, Kaffel D, Kchir MM

La Tunisie medicale, 2019

43 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Osteoporosis and fractures are known to complicate spondyloarthritis (SA). The Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) estimate the 10-year probability of major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) and also hip fracture (FH). It can be useful as risk assessment tools for the purpose of preventing fracture in SA.

AIM: To measure the bone mineral density (BMD), to evaluate the FRAX and to determinate factors associated with high risk of fracture in patients with SA.

METHODS: It's a prospective cross-sectional study that included seventy-five patients admitted for SA, in the rheumatology department of Kassab institute in Tunisia. All of them fulfilled the modified New York criteria for SA.

RESULTS: Sixty-two men and thirteen women were enrolled, with mean age of 36.8 ± 11.8 years. The mean age at disease onset was 27.8± 9.9 years. Mean BASDAI and ASDAS CRP were respectively 3.5 ± 2.4 and 3 ± 0.83. The mean BASRI was 8.9 ± 4.2 and the mean mSASSS was 17.6 ± 19.6. Vitamin D insuffiency and deficiency were found in 43 and 30 patients respectively. Osteoporosis (T score ≤ -2,5 SD) were found in 49% of patients and 80 % of them have a reduced BMD (T score ≤ -1 SD). The mean MOF score was 0,36 ± 0,3 [0-0,9] and the mean FH score was 0,3 ± 0 [0-0,5].The MOF was significantly associated with Bone loss (p=0.000). A trend for a significant association was also found with ASDASCRP (p=0.05). The MOF and FH were both significantly associated to the age at the onset of SA (respectively,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 43 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free