Evidence Hub

Clinico-Epidemiological Assessment of Vitamin D Deficiency in Vertebral Fragility Fracture Patients: A Descriptive Observational Study from A Tertiary Care Hospital in Northwestern India

Subhash N. Subhash, K. Dayma, K. Jakhar

International Journal of Current Pharmaceutical Review and Research, 2026

45 participants

Abstract

Background: Vitamin D deficiency is a widely prevalent nutritional disorder, particularly among the elderly, and has been implicated as a significant risk factor for osteoporotic fragility fractures. However, data regarding its prevalence specifically in patients with vertebral fragility fractures from Northwestern India remain limited. Aim: To assess the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in patients presenting with vertebral fragility fractures at a tertiary care hospital in Northwestern India and to evaluate its correlation with demographic and fracture-related variables. Materials and Methods: This hospital-based, cross-sectional descriptive observational study was conducted at the Department of Orthopaedics, S.M.S. Medical College and Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan. A total of 45 patients aged >16 years with confirmed vertebral fragility fractures were enrolled after obtaining informed consent. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] levels were measured using chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA). Vitamin D status was categorized as deficient (<20 ng/mL), insufficient (20–29 ng/mL), or sufficient (≥30 ng/mL). Demographic data, fracture type (wedge, biconcave, crush), fracture site, and number of fractures were recorded. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: Of the 45 patients, 26 (57.8%) were female and 19 (42.2%) were male with a mean age of 62.8 ± 6.4 years. The mean serum 25(OH)D level was 19.22 ± 3.95 ng/mL. All 45 patients (100%) had suboptimal vitamin…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 45 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free