Evidence Hub

Global prevalence and antibiotic resistance profiles of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa reported from 2014 to 2024: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Ramatla T, Nkhebenyane J, Lekota KE, Thekisoe O, Monyama M, Achilonu CC, Khasapane G

Frontiers in microbiology, 2025

48 citations

Abstract

Introduction: Carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) represents a global threat, but the global distribution of carbapenem resistant bacteria remains a critical issue in public health.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the global pooled prevalence estimate (PPE) of CRPA and their antibiotic resistance. The systematic review protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024579654). This study was carried out following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed using Cochrane Q test and I2 test statistics based on the random effects model. Comprehensive meta-analysis software v4.0 was used to analyze the pooled prevalence of CRPA.

Results: A total of 163 studies (both clinical and screening samples) containing a total of 58,344 cases from 39 countries were included in this study. The overall PPE of CRPA was 34.7% (95% CI: 0.316-0.37.8) for both clinical and screening samples. Meropenem had a PPE of 31.2% (95% CI: 0.272-0.352) and imipenem had the lowest PPE of 27.7% (95% CI: 0.238-0.319). Japan had the highest PPE at 98.2% (95% CI: 0.482-0.100) of CRPA, and the lowest was observed for Saudi Arabia at 13.9% (95% CI: 0. 064-0. 277). CRPA is widespread on five continents except Australia and Antarctica, while the highest PPE is in Europe at 47.6% (95% CI: 0.359-0.595) and the lowest in Asia at 32, 8% (95% CI: 0.293-0.364). The relatively higher PPE of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free