Evidence Hub

Romosozumab for cancer treatment-induced bone loss in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: a case series

Tsujino S, Koyanagi H, Sawamura C, Tozuka K, Gokita T

Archives of osteoporosis, 2026

22 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Romosozumab was associated with increases in bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer and cancer treatment-induced bone loss (CTIBL). No clinical signals of fracture occurrence or cancer recurrence were observed; however, these findings are based on a small retrospective case series and require confirmation in larger prospective studies.

BACKGROUND: Cancer treatment-induced bone loss (CTIBL) is a major complication in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer receiving aromatase inhibitor therapy. Although antiresorptive agents are commonly used, some patients continue to experience progressive bone loss or fragility fractures. Romosozumab, a monoclonal antibody against sclerostin, has demonstrated efficacy in postmenopausal osteoporosis; however, clinical data in patients with cancer remain limited.

METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 22 postmenopausal women with clinically non-metastatic (Stage I-III) hormone receptor-positive breast cancer who received romosozumab for CTIBL at a single institution. Romosozumab was administered for 12 months in patients with progressive bone loss, new fragility fractures, or high fracture risk. All patients received concomitant calcium and/or active vitamin D supplementation. Changes in bone mineral density (BMD), bone turnover markers, and tumor markers (CA15-3, CEA) were evaluated. Differences in skeletal response were also evaluated between…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 22 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free