Evidence Hub

Clinical and genetic insights into Autosomal Dominant Hypocalcemia type 1: a single-center case series including genotype-phenotype correlations, pregnancy outcomes, and novel CASR variants

Della Valentina S, Pierotti L, Sardella C, Dal Lago A, Pardi E, Michelucci A, Caligo MA, Piaggi P et al.

Journal of endocrinological investigation, 2026

11 participants

Abstract

PURPOSE: The main purpose of this study was to provide a comprehensive characterization of adult patients with Autosomal Dominant Hypocalcemia type 1 (ADH1), focusing on clinical and biochemical features, with particular attention to renal involvement, skeletal features and ectopic calcifications. The secondary aims were to explore potential genotype-phenotype correlations, describe two previously unreported CASR variants, and report pregnancy outcomes in affected women.

METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, single-centre study of 11 adults with genetically confirmed ADH1 followed at a tertiary Endocrinology Unit between March 2012 and May 2025. Clinical presentation, biochemical data, renal and cerebral involvement, skeletal status and treatment history were collected at first evaluation and during follow-up. CASR variants were identified by next-generation sequencing with Sanger confirmation, and genotype-phenotype relationships were explored.

RESULTS: At diagnosis, 64% of patients reported hypocalcemia-related symptoms, while 36% were asymptomatic. Nephrolithiasis, nephrocalcinosis and basal ganglia calcifications were frequent, in patients exposed to long-term calcium and active vitamin D therapy, although causal relationships cannot be established. Axial BMD was normal or increased, whereas radial BMD was often reduced and bone turnover markers were low-normal; no fragility fractures were documented. We identified two novels CASR missense variants and observed marked…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 11 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free