Evidence Hub

Revisiting the activate depress free and repeat (ADFR) paradigm: Clinical use of cyclic romosozumab

Hare K, Wheeler S, Morganti C, Krueger D, Kimmel D, Binkley N

Archives of osteoporosis, 2026

41 participants

Abstract

Osteoporosis treatment does not normalize BMD. We hypothesized cyclic romosozumab dosing might provide greater BMD increases. Cyclic therapy (six romosozumab monthly doses then one denosumab dose) produced broadly similar BMD increases as previously reported for 12 romosozumab doses. A second cycle further increased spine and hip BMD but with a blunted response.

Purpose: Evaluating novel osteoporosis medication approaches to maximize BMD is reasonable. A bone remodeling-based cyclic approach, i.e., activate, depress, free and repeat (ADFR), has been proposed. We hypothesized that short course romosozumab followed by denosumab represents an appropriate cycle. This exploratory retrospective case series reports six months of romosozumab treatment then one denosumab dose, followed by a second identical cycle.

Methods: Women at very high fracture risk were offered cyclic therapy. DXA was obtained at baseline, 1 and 2 years. Data from 41 women treated for 1, and 18 for 2 years are reported. Percent BMD change from baseline was evaluated by ANOVA.

Results: Patient mean (SD) age and BMI were 68.8 (6.6) years and 25.6 (5.0) kg/m2 respectively. Mean total hip T-score was -2.5, FRAX estimated hip fracture risk was 6.9%. After one cycle, mean ± SEM% BMD increase (all p < 0.001) from baseline at the lumbar spine (LS), total hip (TH) and femur neck (FN) was 12.6 ± 1.1%, 5.9 ± 0.8% and 4.4 ± 0.9% respectively. In 18 women completing a second cycle, BMD further increased to + 17.5% and +…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 41 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free