Evidence Hub

Are sacral stress fractures in young women truly rare? a retrospective MRI analysis of 1970 patients

Bayram Y, Doğan S, Yalvaç B, Aksoy SH, Karataş ME

Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2026

1,970 participants

Abstract

Background: Sacral stress/insufficiency fractures (SSFs) are underrecognized causes of postpartum low-back/pelvic pain and are frequently misattributed to lumbar disc disease. To determine the MRI-based detection rate and clinical/imaging characteristics of SSFs in women aged 18-50 years undergoing lumbosacral MRI, with subgroup analyses for postpartum versus non-postpartum status.

Methods: Retrospective review of 2400 lumbosacral MRI examinations (January 2020-December 2024) corresponding to 1970 unique women. SSFs were identified by a fellowship-trained musculoskeletal radiologist. Prespecified exclusions (chronic corticosteroid use, major pelvic trauma, incomplete follow-up) yielded the analytic cohort. Group comparisons reported effect sizes (Hedges' g for continuous; risk difference [RD]/odds ratio [OR] for binary) with 95% CIs.

Results: Crude MRI-based detection rate: 1.52% (30/1,970; 95% CI, 1.07-2.17); analytic MRI-based detection rate: 1.17% (23/1,970; 95% CI, 0.78-1.75). Median age 34 years (range 22-49); 10/23 (43.5%) postpartum. Five cases (21.7%) were initially misdiagnosed. Fractures most often involved the sacral ala (right 12, left 10, bilateral 1). Compared with non-postpartum patients, postpartum patients had lower hemoglobin (**11.5 vs 12.6 g/dL; p = 0.007; Hedges' g = 1.21, 95% CI 0.34-2.09) and hematocrit (**33.9% vs 37.3%; p = 0.007; g = 1.21, 95% CI 0.34-2.09); vitamin D was lower but nonsignificant (**15.4 vs 20.3 ng/mL; p = 0.204; g = 0.53, 95% CI -…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 1,970 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free