Evidence Hub

A synthetic cohort analysis of postoperative management of primary cardiac angiosarcoma and a case report

Cai Y, Yang H, Yuan D, Jin SH, Xu J, Hu W, Bai Y, Li X et al.

Frontiers in oncology, 2025

Abstract

Background: Primary cardiac angiosarcoma is a rare and aggressive malignancy originating from the endothelial lining of cardiac blood vessels. The prognosis remains extremely poor. The study was to evaluate postoperative survival in patients with primary cardiac angiosarcoma after treated with adjuvant therapy.

Methods: A systematic review of PubMed from January 1985 to December 2023 was performed to establish a synthetic cohort of patients undergoing surgery for primary cardiac angiosarcoma. Survival analysis was used to assess the relationship between postoperative adjuvant therapy and prognosis. Univariable and multivariable cox regression analyses were used to identify prognostic factors. We then established and validated a nomogram by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves and decision curve analysis (DCA). Moreover, we present a case of 49-year-old patient with primary cardiac angiosarcoma.

Results: In the synthetic cohort, the patients with postoperative adjuvant therapy reached longer overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) than those without postoperative adjuvant therapy (median OS: 14 VS 8 months, HR = 5.62, 95%CI: 1.66-19.08, P<0.001; median PFS: 12 VS 6 months, HR = 2.98, 95%CI: 1.03-8.66, P = 0.007; Log rank test). Radiotherapy (HR = 0.14, 95% CI: 0.04-0.54, P = 0.004) and chemotherapy (HR = 0.03, 95% CI: 0.00-0.27, P = 0.002) were significantly correlated with better OS. DCA and ROC curves confirmed the nomogram…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free