Evidence Hub

The use of i. v. bisphosphonate in pregnancy-associated osteoporosis--case study

Hellmeyer L, Kühnert M, Ziller V, Schmidt S, Hadji P

Experimental and clinical endocrinology & diabetes : official journal, German Society of Endocrinology [and] German Diabetes Association, 2007

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Diagnosis of pregnancy-associated osteoporosis is often delayed and therapeutic interventions insufficient.

STUDY DESIGN: A 28-year-old patient (BMI=18.6) with no additional risks for osteoporosis experienced acute lumbosacral pain two months postpartum, while lactating. After conservative therapy, thoracic and lumbar spine were X-rayed: severe pregnancy-associated osteoporosis with vertebral fractures was diagnosed. 2-year treatment with i. v. bisphosphonate ibandronate was initiated (2 mg every 3 months) and calcium and vitamin D supplementation.

RESULTS: Rapid improvement was observed. Conclusion: In cases with multiple fractures i. v. bisphosphonate leads to substantial decrease of symptoms and further fractures and significant increase of bone mass density (BMD).

CONCLUSION: In severe cases of pregnancy-associated osteoporosis with multiple fractures i. v. biphosphonate therapy leads to a decrease of symptoms and fracture risk and an increase of bone mass density (BMD).

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free