Evidence Hub

Severe vitamin D deficiency osteomalacia by coincidence of multiple risk factors

Bätge B, Struck J, Klein HH, Brinckmann J

Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 2000

Abstract

HISTORY: An 82-year-old woman was admitted with bilateral clavicular fractures after falling out of bed. She complained of pain in all her bones. She reported having undergone a partial gastrectomy (Billroth II) 40 years ago with subsequent milk intolerance and a dislike of direct sun light.

INVESTIGATIONS: Scintigraphy revealed multiple areas of abnormal uptake. Conventional radiography showed in both ulnae transverse zones of increased density with a central translucent band. Laboratory tests demonstrated the constellation of increased bone turnover in secondary hyperparathyroidism with hypocalcaemia (1.49 mmol/l) and hypophyosphataemia (0.62 mmol/l). The 25-hydroxyvitamin D-level was too low to be measured. Ileal crest biopsy indicated osteomalacia.

TREATMENT AND COURSE: Serum levels of calcium, alkaline phosphatase and vitamin D became normal after 7 weeks of daily administration of 10,000 IU vitamin D and 1000 mg calcium. The severe pains had subsided after two weeks and no longer required analgesics.

CONCLUSION: Multiple areas of increased uptake on skeletal scintigraphy, combined with diffuse bone pain and increased alkaline phosphatase, were at first misinterpreted as extensive skeletal metastases. But the history, at first seemingly of little significance, contained three long-term risk factors for the development of vitamin D and calcium deficiency and thus of osteomalacia, namely partial gastrectomy, milk intolerance and inadequate exposure to sun light. Early…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free