Evidence Hub

Recurrent Midshaft Clavicle Nonunion with a Large Segmental Bone Defect Treated with Autologous Iliac Crest Bone Graft and Dual Plating: A Case Report

Pérez-Zierenberg A, Cobián-Pérez S, Salem-Hernández J, Pérez-López CJ

Journal of orthopaedic case reports, 2026

Abstract

Introduction: Clavicle fractures are common, and although most midshaft fractures heal successfully, large segmental defects are associated with an increased risk of nonunion. Clavicle nonunion is often severely disabling, with patients experiencing chronic pain, progressive deformity, reduced shoulder strength, and impaired upper-extremity function. The standard approach reserves non-vascularized iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) for defects up to about 3 cm, whereas larger defects are conventionally reconstructed with vascularized grafts. Reports of successful non-vascularized iliac crest grafting for very large segmental defects, particularly in the revision setting after prior failed fixation and grafting, are uncommon. We present this case to expand the documentation of non-vascularized reconstruction and to offer technical guidance for this challenging clinical scenario.

Case report: A 40-year-old woman of Hispanic (Puerto Rican) background presented with right shoulder pain and functional limitation after two prior operations for a displaced midshaft clavicle fracture, which left a 4.5-cm segmental defect. She had a longstanding heavy smoking history. After confirmed smoking cessation and nutritional optimization, she underwent open reconstruction with a tricortical autologous iliac crest graft harvested using an ultrasonic bone scalpel, combined with orthogonal dual plating. At 2-year follow-up, she had full active range of motion, normal strength, restored clavicular…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free