Evidence Hub

Case report: A systematic approach for the forensic evaluation of child abuse: lessons from a complex case

Di Lorenzo P, Capasso E, Sammarco A, Pieri M, Casella C

Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026

Abstract

Child abuse (CA) remains a significant public health concern, where distinguishing between accidental and intentional injury is particularly difficult in complex cases involving underlying medical conditions. We present a disturbing case study of severe abuse and neglect to illustrate the necessity of a systematic and evidence-based approach to forensic evaluation. The case featured a complex clinical picture: multiple bone fractures in a child with Infantile Epileptic Spasms Syndrome (West Syndrome), under treatment with valproic acid, and evidence of cocaine exposure. A systematic diagnostic work-up, structured according to authoritative international protocols, was conducted, including detailed medical history, physical examination, imaging, toxicological, and genetic analyses. Despite these compounding challenges, a careful clinical evaluation and critical review of international guidelines led to a definitive diagnosis of child abuse and neglect. This work represents a valuable educational resource for healthcare professionals and underscores the significance of implementing systematic protocols for assessing child maltreatment.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free