Evidence Hub

Acromion and Clavicle Stress Fractures After Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Reflect Failure to Address Osteoporosis: A Case Report and Literature Review

John T Cronin, Kevin B Curtis, Brett W Richards, Julia N. Hibbard, J. Skedros

Cureus, 2025

1 citation

Abstract

The exponential increase in the rate of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has been accompanied by a rise in complication rates of this procedure. Of these, peri-prosthetic stress fractures can be particularly problematic due to their potential to cause significant impairment of shoulder function. Despite the association between these stress fractures and osteopenia/osteoporosis, pre-operative bone density assessment is not standard practice for elective RTSA. We report the case of a 68-year-old female patient who, at eleven weeks after elective RTSA (for rotator cuff-tear arthropathy), experienced a non-traumatic stress (insufficiency) fracture of the acromion process of the ipsilateral scapula. Thirteen weeks later, new-onset pain occurred with minimal shoulder use, and a midshaft clavicle stress fracture was detected. She was then diagnosed and treated for osteoporosis, vitamin D deficiency, and hypothyroidism. An ultrasound-based bone-growth stimulator was used to treat both fractures, but only the acromion fracture healed. The clavicle fracture became a 100% displaced chronic non-union. However, the patient felt that surgical fixation of the clavicle fracture would not provide a significant benefit. At 1.5 years after the RTSA, she was moderately satisfied with her shoulder function and highly satisfied with pain reduction, and no additional surgery was required. This is the first reported case describing a patient with acromion and clavicle stress fractures…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free