Evidence Hub

Comparative bioavailability of two oral formulations of levofloxacin in healthy Mexican volunteers

M, Flores-Murrieta FJ

International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2009

27 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the bioequivalence of two levofloxacin 500 mg tablets marketed in Mexico.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: The clinical investigation was designed as a randomized, open-labeled, two-part, two-treatment, two-period crossover study, in 27 healthy male volunteers. 1 tablet of each formulation was administered with 200 ml of water after 10 h overnight fast. After dosing, serial blood samples were collected for a period of 24 h. Plasma concentrations were determined by a validated high-performance liquid chromatographic method and pharmacokinetic parameters were obtained by non-compartmental approach. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was carried out using log-transformed AUClast, AUC yen and Cmax and untransformed tmax, and 90% confidence intervals for AUClast, AUC yen and Cmax were calculated. If the 90% confidence intervals (CI) for AUClast, AUC yen and Cmax fell fully within the interval 80 - 125%, the bioequivalence of the two formulations was established.

RESULTS: The means (test and reference) for AUClast were 58.869 and 56.297 microg x h/ml, for AUC yen were 63.456 and 60.748 microg x h/ml and for Cmax were 8.691 and 8.445 microg/ml. The geometric mean ratios of the test formulation to reference formulation for AUClast, AUC yen and Cmax (CI) were 104.53% (102.73 - 106.36%), 104.37% (102.04 - 106.75%) and 103.45% (95.57 - 111.97%), respectively. All 90% CI for AUClast, AUC yen and Cmax fell within the Mexican Federal Commission for Prevention of Sanitary Risks…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 27 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free