Evidence Hub

Phase II Investigation of the Efficacy of Antimycobacterial Therapy in Chronic Pulmonary Sarcoidosis

Drake WP, Culver DA, Baughman RP, Judson MA, Crouser ED, James WE, Ayers GD, Ding T et al.

Chest, 2021

49 participants · 37 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A Phase I, single-center investigation found that 8 weeks of antimycobacterial therapy improved sarcoidosis FVC. Safety and efficacy assessments have not been performed in a multicenter cohort.

RESEARCH QUESTION: The objective of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of antimycobacterial therapy on the physiological and immunologic end points of sarcoidosis.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter investigation, patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis were randomly assigned to receive 16 weeks of concomitant levofloxacin, ethambutol, azithromycin, and rifabutin (CLEAR) or matching placebo to investigate the effect on FVC. The primary outcome was a comparison of change in percentage of predicted FVC among patients randomized to receive CLEAR or placebo in addition to their baseline immunosuppressive regimen. Secondary outcomes included 6-min walk distance (6MWD), St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) score, adverse events, and decrease in mycobacterial early secreted antigenic target of 6 kDa (ESAT-6) immune responses.

RESULTS: The intention-to-treat analysis revealed no significant differences in change in FVC among the 49 patients randomized to receive CLEAR (1.1% decrease) compared with the 48 randomized to receive placebo (0.02% increase) (P = .64). Physiological parameters such as the change in 6MWD were likewise similar (P = .91); change in SGRQ favored placebo (-8.0 for placebo vs -1.5 for CLEAR; P =…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 49 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free