Bone Fractures with Sodium-Glucose Co-transporter-2 Inhibitors: How Real is the Risk?
Abstract
This article succinctly summarizes the available evidence on the risk of bone fractures with sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors. The US Food and Drug Administration has strengthened the warning for canagliflozin related to the increased risk of bone fractures, and added new information about decreased bone mineral density. The agency has also said that it will evaluate the risk of bone fractures with other drugs in the sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor class. Increases in parathyroid hormone levels and decreases in 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D levels have been postulated as possible mechanisms. In contrast, some studies with dapagliflozin have shown no effects on bone health. Because a consensus has not been reached, we believe that an expert opinion on how to interpret the available evidence would be of great benefit for clinicians.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Effectiveness of Bisphosphonates and Denosumab on Risk of Vertebral Fractures in Prostate Cancer Patients Under Androgen Deprivation Therapies: A Real-World Prospective Study
- Osteoporosis-related fractures after spinal cord injury: a retrospective study from Brazil
- Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D, parathyroid hormone, and mortality in older men
- Lack of Association between Vitamin D Insufficiency and Cardiovascular or Fracture Risk: A UK Biobank Study
- Muscle strength and body composition are clinical indicators of osteoporosis
- Incidence of bone protection and associated fragility injuries in patients with proximal femur fractures
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.