Evidence Hub

Implementing an AI-enhanced clinical decision support system for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: a survey-based randomized controlled trial of antibiotic precision and impact on survival

Lin TH, Chung HY, Jian MJ, Chang CK, Perng CL, Chang FY, Chen YH, Shang HS

Implementation science : IS, 2025

800 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Background: The World Health Organization has identified Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (SM) as a high-risk antibiotic-resistant pathogen. Notably, determining the effectiveness of current antibiotics against SM is challenging, leading to improper therapy and the spread of resistance. This study assessed how an artificial intelligence-clinical decision support system (AI-CDSS) utilizing mass spectrometry data to predict resistance enhances prescribing decisions and boosts survival.

Methods: This randomized controlled trial (ISRCTN16278872) involved 400 healthcare professionals, with 1,600 SM infections randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either standard practice (control, n = 800) or an AI-CDSS predicting resistance 1 day earlier (intervention, n = 800). Outcomes were assessed by healthcare professionals using structured surveys on days 3, 5, 7, and 14 after treatment initiation. Patient mortality was analyzed over a 14-day follow-up period.

Results: The AI-CDSS group demonstrated significantly higher confidence (p < 0.001) in antibiotic prescription, decision-making efficiency, and appropriate antibiotic selection across all time points. Mortality was lower in the AI-CDSS group (92/800, 11.5%) than in the control group (121/800, 15.1%) (p = 0.03). Effective antibiotic choices and reliance on the AI-CDSS during the critical early stages of treatment contributed to improved patient outcomes.

Conclusions: Implementation of the AI-CDSS in a clinical trial setting enhances prescribing…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 800 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free