Evidence Hub

Phage therapy analysis of effectiveness in comorbid patients with wounds and surgical infections of various etiology based on the results of a comparative clinical study

Paskhalova YS, Mitish VA, Khamidulin GV, Chekmareva IA, Terekhova RP, Demidova VS, Paklina OV

Khirurgiia, 2025

70 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The continued importance of addressing the issue of treating purulent wounds and surgical infections of different origins and localization against the background of increased resistance of their main pathogens dictates the need to develop alternative protocols and search for new treatment strategies, the effectiveness of which is confirmed by objective diagnostic methods.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to analyze the effectiveness of phage therapy in comparison with traditional methods of local drug and systemic treatment in comorbid patients with surgical infection of various etiologies and localization by studying the microbiological spectrum, cytology of wound impressions and morphological, including electron microscopic examination of tissue biopsies.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: The results of the research are presented: a post-marketing, prospective, randomized, comparative clinical trial enrolling 70 adult patients with complicated skin, soft tissue, and bone infections of various etiologies and localizations, conducted at the Department of Wounds and Wound Infections, National Medical Research Center for Surgery named after A. Vishnevsky, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. During the study, clinical (edema, pain, the nature of wound discharge, the appearance of granulation tissue), laboratory (the presence and regression of signs of a systemic response to the presence of a surgical infection), microbiological (qualitative and quantitative),…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 70 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free