Evidence Hub

Prognostic factors associated with primary non-responsiveness to antibiotics and appendicitis recurrence for CT-diagnosed uncomplicated acute appendicitis: secondary analysis of two randomized clinical trials

Selänne L, Hurme S, Sippola S, Rautio T, Nordström P, Rantanen T, Pinta T, Ilves I et al.

The British journal of surgery, 2025

856 participants · 4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Antibiotics are safe and efficient for CT-diagnosed uncomplicated acute appendicitis. Identifying predictive factors of primary non-responsiveness or recurrence would further improve antibiotic treatment success and safety. Methods All patients treated with antibiotics in two large RCTs (APPAC and APPAC II) were included. The primary non-responsiveness analysis compared patients operated on within 30 days after randomization for complicated appendicitis with either patients presenting with uncomplicated appendicitis at surgery within 30 days or patients with successful antibiotic treatment during 3-year follow-up. Prognostic factors for appendicitis recurrence were assessed by comparing patients with successful antibiotic treatment with patients with acute appendicitis operated on after 30 days of initial antibiotics. Results Of 856 patients randomized to antibiotics (mean(s.d.) age of 36(12) years; 365 (42.6%) were women), 832 were eligible for non-responsiveness analysis and 732 for appendicitis recurrence analysis. Findings associated with primary non-responsiveness on admission included an appendiceal diameter ≥15 mm (adjusted risk ratio (RR) 4.00 (95% c.i. 2.00 to 7.92) (P 38°C (adjusted RR 2.76 (95% c.i. 1.27 to 6.03) (P = 0.011)). During the first 6–30 h after admission, C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥100 mg/l (negative predictive value of 99%) and leucocyte count ≥9 × 109/l were associated with primary non-responsiveness (adjusted RR 8.29 (95% c.i.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 856 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free