Evidence Hub

Need for additional calcium to reduce the risk of HIP or ANY nonvertebral fracture with vitamin D supplementation: evidence from a comparative meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Patrick Haentjens, Dirk Vanderschueren, Paul T.A.M. Lips, Steven Boonen

Orthopaedic Proceedings, 2009

9,227 participants · 14 citations

Abstract

Objectives: A recent meta-analysis (JAMA. 2005;293:2257–2264) reported that supplementation with oral vitamin D 700–800 IU/day reduces the risk of hip or any nonvertebral fracture in elderly individuals by approximately 25%. However, this metaanalysis was unable to define the role of additional calcium supplementation. The aim of the current study was to assess the need for calcium supplementation in individuals receiving vitamin D for the prevention of hip and nonvertebral fractures. Methods: MEDLINE (search terms: ‘vitamin D’ AND ‘hip fracture’), bibliographies of articles retrieved, and the authors’ reference files were used to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of oral vitamin D supplementation with or without calcium supplementation vs placebo/no treatment in postmenopausal women and/or older men (over 50 years) specifically reporting hip fracture risk. Data extraction was independent by Results: All pooled analyses are based on random-effects models. Based on 4 RCTs (9083 subjects), the pooled relative risk (RR) of hip fracture for vitamin D supplementation alone was 1.10 (95% confidence intervals [CI], 0.89 to 1.36). No between-trial heterogeneity was observed. For the 5 RCTs (9227 subjects) of vitamin D supplementation with calcium supplementation, the pooled RR for hip fracture was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.64 to 0.97). There was no heterogeneity between trials. The RRs for all nonvertebral fracture were 0.98 (0.83 to 0.16) for vitamin D alone and 0.84 (0.73 to…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 9,227 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free