Evidence Hub

Randomized multicenter trial comparing minocycline and ornidazole with classical quadruple therapy in Helicobacter pylori treatment

Lin Y, Lin X, Suo B, Chen Q, Cheng X, Lin Z, Huang X

Scientific reports, 2025

390 participants · 6 citations

Abstract

This study evaluated the efficacy, safety, and cost of minocycline, ornidazole, esomeprazole, and bismuth (MOEB) therapy versus classical therapy (amoxicillin, clarithromycin, esomeprazole, and bismuth potassium citrate, ACEB) for Helicobacter pylori eradication. In a randomized trial of 390 patients, MOEB demonstrated superior eradication rates (93.2% per-protocol, 78.5% intention-to-treat) compared to ACEB (82.5% per-protocol, 72.8% intention-to-treat). Adverse events were significantly lower with MOEB (19.3% vs. 33.8%, p = 0.0019). MOEB was also more cost-effective, with a direct cost of 675.7 CNY versus 970.1 CNY for ACEB, yielding an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of -27.5 CNY per eradication rate. MOEB is a safe, effective, and cost-efficient first-line regimen for H. pylori eradication.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 390 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free