Evidence Hub

VII. Meta-Analysis of Calcium Supplementation for the Prevention of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis

Beverley Shea, George Wells, Ann Cranney, Nicole L. Zytaruk, Vivian A Robinson, Lauren E. Griffith, Zulma Ortiz, Joan Peterson et al.

Endocrine Reviews, 2002

1,806 participants · 399 citations

Abstract

Objective: To summarize controlled trials examining the effect of calcium on bone density and fractures in postmenopausal women. Data Source: We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE up to 1998 and the Cochrane Controlled Register up to 2000, and we examined citations of relevant articles and proceedings of international meetings. We contacted osteoporosis investigators to identify additional studies, and primary authors for unpublished data. Study Selection: We included 15 trials (1806 patients) that randomized postmenopausal women to calcium supplementation or usual calcium intake in the diet and reported bone mineral density of the total body, vertebral spine, hip, or forearm, or recorded the number of fractures, and followed patients for at least 1 yr. Data Extraction: For each trial, three independent reviewers assessed the methodological quality and extracted data. Data Synthesis: We found calcium to be more effective than placebo in reducing rates of bone loss after two or more years of treatment. The pooled difference in percentage change from baseline was 2.05% [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.24–3.86] for total body bone density, 1.66% (95% CI 0.92–2.39) for the lumbar spine, 1.64% (95% CI 0.70–2.57) for the hip, and 1.91% (95% CI 0.33–3.50) for the distal radius. The relative risk (RR) of fractures of the vertebrae was 0.77, with a wide CI (95% CI 0.54–1.09); the RR for nonvertebral fractures was 0.86 (95% CI 0.43–1.72). Conclusions: Calcium supplementation alone has a small…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,806 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free