Evidence Hub

II. Meta-Analysis of Alendronate for the Treatment of Postmenopausal Women

Ann Cranney, George Wells, Andrew R. Willan, Lauren E. Griffith, Nicole L. Zytaruk, Vivian A Robinson, Dennis M. Black, Jonathan Derrick Adachi et al.

Endocrine Reviews, 2002

12,855 participants · 446 citations

Abstract

Objective: To review the effect of alendronate on bone density and fractures in postmenopausal women. Data Source: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Current Contents, and the Cochrane Controlled trials registry from 1980 to 1999, and we examined citations of relevant articles and proceedings of international meetings. Study Selection: We included 11 trials that randomized women to alendronate or placebo and measured bone density for at least 1 yr. Data Extraction: For each trial, three independent reviewers assessed the methodological quality and abstracted data. Data Synthesis: The pooled relative risk (RR) for vertebral fractures in patients given 5 mg or more of alendronate was 0.52 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.43–0.65]. The RR of nonvertebral fractures in patients given 10 mg or more of alendronate was 0.51 (95% CI 0.38–0.69), an appreciably greater effect than for the 5 mg dose. We found a similar reduction in RR across nonvertebral fracture types; in particular, RR reductions for fractures traditionally thought to be “osteoporotic,” such as hip and forearm, were very similar to RR reductions for “nonosteoporotic” fractures. Individual studies showed similar results, reflected in the P values of the test of heterogeneity (P = 0.99 for vertebral and 0.88 for nonvertebral fractures). Alendronate produced positive effects on the percentage change in bone density, which increased with both dose and time. After 3 yr of treatment with 10 mg of alendronate or more, the pooled…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 12,855 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free