Evidence Hub

Impact of supplementing Limosilactobacillus fermentum MN-LF23 on the eradication of Helicobacter pylori with 14-day standard quadruple therapy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Zhao Y, Niu X, Zhang Y, Zhao L, Zhang L, He J, Zhang Q, Mao Y et al.

Nutrition journal, 2025

94 participants · 4 citations

Abstract

Background: The effect of probiotics on Helicobacter pylori (Hp) infection demonstrates considerable heterogeneity. This study aims to elucidate the role of Limosilactobacillus fermentum MN-LF23 (MN-LF23) in Hp-infected populations.

Methods: A total of 94 adult patients with confirmed Hp infection were enrolled in this study and randomly allocated to the placebo or MN-LF23 group. Patients initially received either placebo or probiotics along with standard quadruple therapy for 2 weeks, followed by continued administration of either placebo or probiotics for an additional 4 weeks. The eradication of Hp, serum levels of inflammatory factors, and alterations in gastrointestinal symptoms were assessed at weeks 0, 2, and 6, while fecal samples were collected for metagenomic sequencing.

Results: The results showed no significant difference (P = 1) in the eradication rate between the placebo group (85.11%) and the probiotic group (82.98%). Following treatment, the incidence of constipation, dyspepsia, and Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) scores in the probiotic group were markedly lower (P < 0.05) compared to those observed in the placebo group. Throughout the treatment process, there were no significant differences in TNF-α and IL-1β levels between the two groups. Compared to the placebo group, the probiotic group exhibited a significant increase in beneficial bacteria such as Limosilactobacillus fermentum, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, Bifidobacterium longum,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 94 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free