Evidence Hub

Bone Quality Beyond DXA in People Living with HIV: A Systematic Review of HR-pQCT, TBS, Microindentation, and Vertebral Fractures

Razvan DV, Rosca O, Bratosin F, Predescu V, Vlad SV, Vlad A

Journal of clinical medicine, 2025

1 citation

Abstract

Background and Objectives: People living with HIV (PLWH) have excess fragility fractures not fully explained by areal DXA. We reviewed bone "quality" in PLWH-microarchitecture, estimated strength, tissue-level properties-and vertebral fractures (VFs). Methods: PRISMA-conform systematic review (2000-2025) of randomized, cohort, and cross-sectional studies assessing HR-pQCT (±finite-element analysis), trabecular bone score (TBS), impact microindentation (BMSi), femoral QCT/MRI, and VF imaging (DXA-VFA or radiography). Risk of bias used ROBINS-I (non-randomized) and RoB 2 (randomized/switch). No meta-analysis was performed due to clinical/methodological heterogeneity; evidence was synthesized narratively per SWiM. Results: Fourteen studies met criteria. HR-pQCT showed cortical/trabecular deficits with lower finite-element-estimated strength in PLWH. BMSi was 3-4 units lower; it declined after ART initiation but improved after TDF→TAF switch. TBS was modestly lower and reclassified risk when BMD was non-osteoporotic. VF prevalence was 12-25% and frequently occurred at non-osteoporotic BMD. Signals aligned with modifiable risks (smoking, glucocorticoids) and specific ART exposures. Conclusions: Beyond DXA, PLWH exhibit quantifiable decrements in microarchitecture, estimated strength, and tissue-level properties alongside a meaningful VF burden. TBS and VFA are pragmatic, scalable adjuncts to refine risk; HR-pQCT/BMSi add mechanistic value in research/tertiary settings.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free