Evidence Hub

Antimicrobial resistance in bloodstream infections in West Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Ibadin EE, Dossouvi KM, Omoregie R, Sellera FP, Idemudia NL, Smith SI

BMC infectious diseases, 2026

52,566 participants

Abstract

Background: Early and efficient management of bloodstream infections (BSIs) reduces the risk of complications and death. Therefore, it is crucial to identify antimicrobials with good activity against bacteria isolated from BSIs. This study aimed to determine the bacterial pathogens involved in BSIs, pooled antimicrobial resistance (AMR) rate, AMR phenotype rates, and the evolution of AMR over the years in West Africa.

Methods: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (PRISMA 2020) were used, and the protocol for this review was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) database with the registration identification number (CRD420251064773). Keywords were used to conduct a systematic literature review of electronic databases such as Google Scholar, African Journals Online, PubMed, ResearchGate, Embase, and Scopus. Data analyses were conducted using Stata/MP 17.0, and a random-effects model was used to estimate pooled estimates.

Results: Twenty-three research articles, including samples collected between 2003 and 2022, were selected for this study. The prevalence of BSIs was 13.1% (95% CI: 12.8-13.3) (6,864 blood culture-positive out of the 52,566 patients screened for BSIs). A total of 4,992 bacteria were isolated, including 3,219 Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) and 1,773 Gram-positive bacteria (GPB). The pooled AMR rates of 20 antimicrobials were obtained, and the highest were for ampicillin…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 52,566 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free