Evidence Hub

Colistin-based combination therapy versus monotherapy for carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacterial infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Yang T, Li H, Xu X, An J, Zhang Z, Li B, Dou Z

Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2025

3 citations

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to summarize available data on colistin (COL) combination therapy or monotherapy for carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB).

Methods: Two reviewers independently evaluated and extracted data from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to January 31, 2025, for studies comparing COL combination therapy with monotherapy in patients with CR-GNB infections. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and secondary outcomes included microbiological eradication rate, clinical improvement rate, length of stay (LOS), nephrotoxicity, and neurotoxicity. Differences for dichotomous outcomes were expressed as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), whereas those for continuous outcomes were expressed as mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane tools. Certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE. This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42025636727).

Results: A total of 26 eligible studies were included. Moderate-quality evidence indicates that compared with COL monotherapy, COL combination therapy significantly increased microbial eradication rate (RR 1.07, 95% CI 1.00-1.13, p = 0.04), particularly in infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB). However, there were no significant differences in terms of 28-day all-cause mortality (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.85-1.05, p = 0.30). In addition, low-quality…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free