Evidence Hub

The effect of indacaterol during an acute exacerbation of COPD.

Segreti A, Fiori E, Calzetta L, Sabatini M, Segreti V, Rogliani P, Cazzola M

Pulmonary pharmacology & therapeutics, 2013

29 participants

Abstract

Some clinical trials have suggested that the inhaled long-acting β2-agonists (LABAs) may be effective in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). Since indacaterol, the first once-daily LABA to be developed for the regular treatment of COPD, exhibits fast onset of action and 24-h duration of bronchodilation, we have investigated its effects in patients with AECOPD managed in the emergency department. In a randomised controlled pilot trial, we have enrolled 29 consecutive patients with a recent (i.e., within ≤ 4 d) history of AECOPD and requiring hospitalization. All patients received a standard protocol consisting of ipratropium bromide aerosol 500 μg three times a day, intravenous methylprednisolone 20 mg twice-daily and, if indicated, oral levofloxacin 500 mg once-daily. Moreover, they were randomly allocated to one of the two 5-day treatment groups (indacaterol maleate 300 μg once-daily or salbutamol nebulizer 1250 μg three times a day). The administration of indacaterol 300 μg to patients admitted to emergency department for an AECOPD resulted in a greater improvement of pulmonary function compared with traditional therapy, without cardiovascular side effects. Our results suggest that indacaterol could be a useful option in the treatment of AECOPD. However, further larger double-blinded randomized clinical trials are needed to validate the intriguing results obtained in this setting.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 29 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free