Evidence Hub

Addition of a 2-month low-dose course of levofloxacin to long-term erythromycin therapy in sinobronchial syndrome

Fujimura M, Mizuguchi M, Nakatsumi Y, Mizuhashi K, Sasaki S, Yasui M, Kanazawa Asthma Research Group

Respirology (Carlton, Vic.), 2002

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We previously reported that a 6-month low-dose course of ofloxacin combined with long-term low-dose erythromycin therapy (EM therapy) was superior to EM therapy alone for sinobronchial syndrome (SBS), especially during the initial 2 months of treatment. However, there was no data as to whether discontinuation of low-dose ofloxacin after 2 months results in symptom relapse. This study was designed to clarify this issue.

METHODOLOGY: Twenty-three patients with SBS received a 2-month course of levofloxacin (LVFX) therapy (100 mg once a day) concurrent with a 6-month course of EM therapy (200 mg three times a day) (group A). Eighteen other patients were given the EM therapy alone (group B). Clinical parameters, including quantity of morning sputum, were recorded in a daily symptom diary, and reviewed by each doctor in charge at 2-4 week intervals.

RESULTS: The quantity of morning sputum decreased more rapidly in group A than in group B. No relapse of symptoms was recognized after discontinuation of LVFX in group A.

CONCLUSIONS: A 2-month low-dose course of LVFX in conjunction with long-term EM therapy may be efficacious for the treatment of SBS, as evidenced by rapid improvement of expectoration without any relapse after LVFX discontinuation.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free