Evidence Hub

Steerable versus Conventional flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath (FANS) flexible Ureteroscopy for Lower Pole stones Treatment: study protocol for a multicentre, randomised superiority trial (SCULPT trial)

Yuen SKK, Liu S, Gauhar V, Mai H, He W, Hu H, Ke C, Dai Y et al.

BMJ open, 2025

400 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Introduction: Flexible ureteroscopy has advanced modern stone management; however, lower pole renal stones remain a challenge due to suboptimal ureteroscope deflection and navigation using conventional flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheaths (FANS). The SCULPT trial is designed to assess whether the novel steerable FANS-which enables active controlled deflection-can improve the success rate of lower pole access during flexible ureteroscopy.

Methods and analysis: This multicentre, prospective, single-blinded, randomised controlled superiority trial will recruit 400 adult patients (aged 18-75 years) with solitary lower pole renal stones ≤2 cm diagnosed by CT from 20 high-volume urological centres in China. Participants will be randomised 1:1 to undergo flexible ureteroscopy with either steerable or conventional FANS. The primary outcome is the success rate of navigating into the lower pole calyx (defined as successful direct stone visualisation, laser lithotripsy and aspiration without adjunct use). Secondary outcomes include immediate and 1 month stone-free rates, operative time, complication profiles (graded by Clavien-Dindo), instrument damage rates, quality-of-life assessments and cost analysis. Statistical analysis will be performed using appropriate tests for continuous and categorical data, with their significance set by prespecified superiority margins.

Ethics and dissemination: The study protocol has been designed in accordance with the Declaration of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 400 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free