Evidence Hub

Gut microbiome changes associated with chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Jiaze Hong, Yufang Fu, Xiaoqiang Chen, Yurui Zhang, Xin-Yi Li, Tianhang Li, Yi-Lin Liu, Mengke Fan et al.

International Journal of Surgery, 2024

1,511 participants · 27 citations

Abstract

Background: The study of changes in the microbiome in chronic pancreatitis (CP) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) holds significant potential for developing noninvasive diagnostic tools as well as innovative interventions to alter the progression of diseases. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to analyze in detail the taxonomic and functional characteristics of the gut microbiome in patients with CP and PDAC.

Methods: Two researchers conducted a systematic search across public databases to gather all published research up to June 2023. Diversity and gut microbiota composition are the main outcomes the authors focus on.

Results: This meta-analysis included 14 studies, involving a total of 1511 individuals in the PDAC ( n =285), CP ( n =342), and control ( n =649) groups. Our results show a significant difference in the composition of gut microbiota between PDAC/CP patients compared to healthy controls (HC), as evidenced by a slight decrease in α-diversity, including Shannon (SMD=-0.33; P =0.002 and SMD=-0.59; P <0.001, respectively) and a statistically significant β-diversity ( P <0.05). The pooled results showed that at the phylum level, the proportion of Firmicutes was lower in PDAC and CP patients than in HC patients. At the genus level, more than two studies demonstrated that four genera were significantly increased in PDAC patients compared to HC (e.g. Escherichia-Shigella and Veillonella ). CP patients had an increase in four genera (e.g.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,511 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free