Evidence Hub

Comparing the efficacy and safety of the ABC-14 regimen (azacitidine, venetoclax, and chidamide) with traditional "3 + 7" intensive induction regimen or AB-14 regimen (venetoclax combined with azacitidine) in newly diagnosed AML: study protocol for a prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label clinical trial

Yan H, Huang X, Wu P, Deng C, Li M, Lai P, Du X, Weng J

Trials, 2025

Abstract

Background: Induction therapy is the first critical step in the overall treatment of Acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The "3 + 7" regimen remains the backbone treatment for newly diagnosed AML patients suitable for intense chemotherapy (IC). However, its efficacy, toxicity, high complications management costs, and prolonged hospitalizations necessitate optimization. The azacitidine-venetoclax (AB) regimen is recommended for elderly or IC-ineligible AML patients, but its efficacy and safety remain suboptimal regarding early mortality and specific leukemia subtypes (e.g., M5, RUNX1-, FLT3-ITD-, TP53-mutated AML, or cases with high MCL-1 expression). Chidamide, a novel oral histone deacetylase inhibitor, counteracts venetoclax-induced MCL-1 upregulation and synergizes with azacitidine-venetoclax to induce AML cell apoptosis. Whether the Azacitidine, Venetoclax, and Chidamide (ABC) regimen can match the "3 + 7" or AB regimen in newly diagnosed AML induction therapy warrants investigation.

Methods: Newly diagnosed AML patients will be stratified by IC suitability into unfit-AML and fit-AML. Unfit-AML patients will be randomized to receive ABC-14 or AB-14 regimens. Fit-AML patients will be randomized to receive ABC-14 or "3 + 7" regimens. The primary endpoint is composite complete response rate (CRc). Secondary endpoints include the measurable residual disease (MRD) negative rate, duration of remission (DoR), 1-year Relapsed-free survival (RFS) rate, 1-year overall survival (OS)…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free